An Unconventional Cancer Treatment Lacking Clinical Efficacy Remains Available to Italian Cancer Patients

Author:

Merlo Domenico Franco1,Beccaro Monica2,Costantini Massimo2,Costantini Massimo3,Beccaro Monica3,Di Leo Silvia3,Sormani Maria Pia4,Bruzzi Paolo4,Merlo Domenico Franco5,Morasso Gabriella6,Rossi Paolo Giorgi7,Borgia Piero7,Montella Maurizio8,Grimaldi Maria8,Paci Eugenio9,Susini Nicoletta9,Cecioni Riccardo9,Miccinesi Guido9,Pisanti Renato10,

Affiliation:

1. Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Clinical Trials and Bioethics

2. Regional Palliative Care Network, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy

3. (Regional Palliative Care Network, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa)

4. (Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa);

5. (Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa);

6. (Psychology Service, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa)

7. (Agency for Public Health, Lazio Region, Rome)

8. (Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, G. Pascale Foundation, Naples)

9. (Clinical Epidemiology, Centre for the Study and Prevention of Cancer, Florence)

10. (Labos Foundation, Rome)

Abstract

Aims and Background An unconventional cancer treatment known as “Di Bella multitherapy” gained popularity among Italian cancer patients during the 90's. In 1999, it was shown to lack any detectable antitumor activity. Access to the multitherapy was investigated three years later within the post-bereavement Italian Survey of the Dying of Cancer (ISDOC), whose broader aim was to investigate the end-of-life care experiences of terminal cancer patients. Methods ISDOC was carried out in a two-stage probability sample of 2,000 out of 160,000 Italian cancer patients deceased between March 2002 and June 2003. For each cancer patient, a non-professional caregiver, i.e., the closest and the best-informed person about her/his last three months of life, was identified. A specific question concerning the “Di Bella multitherapy” was included in a semi-structured questionnaire that was administered face-to-face to the caregivers by trained interviewers. Weighted estimates of the frequency of patients receiving the multitherapy in the target population and their 95% confidence intervals were computed by taking into account stratification and clustering of observations. Results During their last three months of life, 0.7% (95% CI, 0.3–1.6) of terminal cancer patients, corresponding to some 1,100 subjects (range, 480–2,560), received the multitherapy. No statistically significant difference was observed for age at death, cancer type, gender, education, marital status, or residence. Conclusions The finding indicates that an unconventional cancer treatment proven to lack clinical efficacy remained accessible to Italian cancer patients. Ethical, deontologic, and economic implications call for a routine monitoring of provision of and access to unproven cancer treatments.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3