Review of the Technical, Toxicological, and PKPD Considerations for Conducting Inhalation Toxicity Studies on Biologic Pharmaceuticals—The Outcome of a Cross-Industry Working Group Survey

Author:

Wolfreys Alison1ORCID,Kilgour Jo2,Allen Andrew D.3,Dudal Sherri4,Freke Mark5,Jones David6,Karantabias George7,Krantz Carsten8,Moore Simon9,Mukaratirwa Sidney9,Price Mark10,Tepper Jeffrey11,Cauvin Annick12,Manetz Scott13,Robinson Ian14

Affiliation:

1. UCB Biopharma, Slough, United Kingdom

2. Regulatory Science Associates, Inverkip, United Kingdom

3. Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy

4. Roche Innovation Centre, Basel, Switzerland

5. Charles River Laboratories, Montreal, Canada

6. MHRA, London, United Kingdom

7. GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA

8. Novartis, Basel, Switzerland

9. Covance, Huntingdon, United Kingdom

10. GSK, Ware, United Kingdom

11. Tepper Nonclinical Consulting, San Carlos, CA, USA

12. UCB Biopharma Srl, Braine-L’Alleud, Belgium

13. AstraZeneca, Cambridge, USA

14. Astrazeneca, Royston, United Kingdom

Abstract

The inhaled route is still a relatively novel route for delivering biologics and poses additional challenges to those encountered with inhaled small molecules, further complicating the design and interpretation of toxicology studies. A working group formed to summarize the current knowledge of inhaled biologics across industry and to analyze data collated from an anonymized cross-industry survey comprising 12 inhaled biologic case studies (18 individual inhalation toxicity studies on monoclonal antibodies, fragment antibodies, domain antibodies, oligonucleotides, and proteins/peptides). The output of this working group provides valuable insights into the issues faced when conducting toxicology studies with inhaled biologics, including common technical considerations on aerosol generation, use of young and sexually mature nonhuman primates, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling, exposure and immunogenicity assessment, maximum dose setting, and no observed adverse effect levels determination. Although the current data set is too small to allow firm conclusions, testing of novel biologics remains an active area and is likely to remain so for molecules where delivery via the inhaled route is beneficial. In the future, it is hoped others will continue to share their experiences and build on the conclusions of this review to further improve our understanding of these complex issues and, ultimately, facilitate the safe introduction of inhaled biologics into clinical use.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cell Biology,Toxicology,Molecular Biology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Analysis of Requirements for Inhalation Toxicity Studies of Chemicals;Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Regulatory Research and Medicine Evaluation;2023-11-09

2. The use of recovery animals in nonclinical safety assessment studies with monoclonal antibodies: further 3Rs opportunities remain;Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology;2023-02

3. Toxicokinetics and organ-specific toxicity;Essentials of Pharmatoxicology in Drug Research, Volume 1;2023

4. Pulmonary Delivery of Antibody for the Treatment of Respiratory Diseases;AAPS Introductions in the Pharmaceutical Sciences;2023

5. Species Selection for Pharmaceutical Toxicity Studies;Drug Discovery and Evaluation: Safety and Pharmacokinetic Assays;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3