Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Agreement in Scoring Severity of Rodent Cardiomyopathy and Relation to Artificial Intelligence–Based Scoring

Author:

Steinbach Thomas J.1ORCID,Tokarz Debra A.1ORCID,Co Caroll A.2ORCID,Harris Shawn F.2,McBride Sandra J.2,Shockley Keith R.3ORCID,Lokhande Avinash4ORCID,Srivastava Gargi4ORCID,Ugalmugle Rajesh4,Kazi Arshad4,Singletary Emily1,Cesta Mark F.3ORCID,Thomas Heath C.5ORCID,Chen Vivian S.67,Hobbie Kristen8,Crabbs Torrie A.1

Affiliation:

1. Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

2. Social & Scientific Systems, Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA

3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

4. AIRA Matrix, Mumbai, India

5. Aclairo Pharmaceutical Development Group, Vienna, Virginia, USA

6. Charles River Laboratories, Durham, North Carolina, USA

7. Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

8. Inotiv, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

Abstract

We previously developed a computer-assisted image analysis algorithm to detect and quantify the microscopic features of rodent progressive cardiomyopathy (PCM) in rat heart histologic sections and validated the results with a panel of five veterinary toxicologic pathologists using a multinomial logistic model. In this study, we assessed both the inter-rater and intra-rater agreement of the pathologists and compared pathologists’ ratings to the artificial intelligence (AI)-predicted scores. Pathologists and the AI algorithm were presented with 500 slides of rodent heart. They quantified the amount of cardiomyopathy in each slide. A total of 200 of these slides were novel to this study, whereas 100 slides were intentionally selected for repetition from the previous study. After a washout period of more than six months, the repeated slides were examined to assess intra-rater agreement among pathologists. We found the intra-rater agreement to be substantial, with weighted Cohen’s kappa values ranging from k = 0.64 to 0.80. Intra-rater variability is not a concern for the deterministic AI. The inter-rater agreement across pathologists was moderate (Cohen’s kappa k = 0.56). These results demonstrate the utility of AI algorithms as a tool for pathologists to increase sensitivity and specificity for the histopathologic assessment of the heart in toxicology studies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3