Affiliation:
1. Bristol-Myers Company, Pharmaceutical Research and Development Division, Syracuse, NY 13221–4755
Abstract
Carcinogenicity testing of antitumor agents in animal bioassays has been proposed because of the potential for carcinogenicity of this class of agents and the expectation that such testing may indicate prospectively the target organs of any related human oncogenesis. The literature reveals the anticipated confirmations in animals of the carcinogenicity of many antitumor agents. Furthermore, these agents have been associated with human tumors in numerous case reports. Review of the literature also indicates the inability of animal studies to predict the sites of carcinogen-induced tumors in man. The carcinogenic risk assessment of antitumor agents should begin with the determination of the ability of the agent to interact with DNA. Those agents which are capable of alkylating or binding DNA should be tested for mutagenic and teratogenic potential. The presumption of carcinogenicity should be made for DNA-reactive, mutagenic/teratogenic antitumor agents without requiring confirmation in long-term carcinogenicity bioassays in large numbers of animals. The inability of carcinogenicity studies in animals to accurately predict potential human tumor sites must also be recognized.
Subject
Cell Biology,Toxicology,Molecular Biology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference73 articles.
1. Established Principles and Unresolved Problems in Carcinogenesis
2. 3. Bristol-Myers Company, Pharmaceutical Research and Development Division. Unpublished data.
3. Bleomycin-induced structural chromosomal aberrations in spermatogonia and bone-marrow cells of mice
4. 5. Canadian Health Protection Branch (1975). The Testing of Chemicals for Carcinogenicity, Mutagenicity and Teratogenicity, pp. 1–183.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献