Evaluation of the Quality and Safety of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Among Gastroenterology Inpatients at a Tertiary Hospital in Australia

Author:

van Oosterom Nameer1,De Guzman Keshia R.1ORCID,Winckel Karl1ORCID,Johnson Anissa1,Falconer Nazanin1

Affiliation:

1. University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Background and objective: Hospital acquired venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) are common and preventable. The Queensland Health VTE prophylaxis guidelines, developed in 2018, provide guidance for risk assessment, and prescribing of anticoagulation for prophylaxis and treatment of hospital inpatients. Currently, there are limited recommendations for gastroenterology patients. This study investigated the completion of VTE risk assessments, and the appropriateness of VTE prophylaxis regimens, in accordance with Queensland Health guidelines for gastroenterology patients. The quality and safety of VTE prophylaxis regimens was assessed based on their VTE risk and bleeding risk. Method: A retrospective study was conducted by obtaining a random sample of gastroenterology patients admitted to a tertiary Australian hospital, from 1st May 2019 and 1st May 2020, to determine the compliance of VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis prescribing with state-wide VTE guidelines. The quality and safety of thromboprophylaxis was evaluated using the modified Caprini and HASBLED scores, and subsequent thromboprophylaxis-related complications. Results: Of the 94 patients reviewed, 68 did not have contraindications to thromboprophylaxis. Of these 68 patients, 32 (47%) had no VTE risk assessment recorded in their clinical records and were not prescribed any thromboprophylaxis during the hospitalization. There was no significant difference between thromboprophylaxis prescribing for patients with low VTE risk, compared to moderate to high VTE risk ( P = .075). There was a trend for decrease in thromboprophylaxis prescribing as HASBLED bleeding risk score increased, and patients with moderate-high bleed risk were less likely to be prescribed thromboprophylaxis ( P = .006). There were no thromboprophylaxis related complications identified. Conclusion: It is essential that all patients have a clearly documented risk assessment and are prescribed thromboprophylaxis according to best practice guidelines. The prescription of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis should continue to be individualized, with each patient assessed holistically.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Pharmacy

Reference23 articles.

1. Government. A. Hospital-Aquired Complication 7 – Venous Thromboembolism. In: Care ACoSaQiH, ed. 2018.

2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Selected best practices and suggestions for improvement for clinicians Hospital-Acquired Complication Venous Thromboembolism. 2018. Accessed September 7, 2018. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/venous-thromboembolism-prevention-clinical-care-standard-clinician-fact-sheet

3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Venous thromboembolism in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-aquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. 2018. Accessed September 7, 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng89.

4. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Prevention and Management of Venous Thromboembolism Edinburgh: SIGN. 2010 (updated 2014) [publication no. 122]. https://www.sign.ac.uk/our-guidelines/prevention-and-management-of-venous-thromboembolism/ Accessed September 7, 2018.

5. Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3