The Euthanasia Debate: Attitudes, Practices and Psychiatric Considerations

Author:

Chochinov Harvey Max1,Wilson Keith G2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychosocial Oncology, Manitoba Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.

2. The Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Medicine and School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.

Abstract

Objective To review the current status of the euthanasia debate by examining public and physician attitudes towards euthanasia, the practice of euthanasia in the Netherlands, recent developments in Canada and other countries, psychosocial considerations related to the desire for death in terminally inpatients, and the roles that psychiatrists may be asked to play in the event of legislative reform involving decriminalization. Methods A literature review was conducted focusing on recent surveys regarding physician and patient attitudes towards euthanasia, the role of psychiatrists and empirical data pertaining to the mental state of patients who request physician-hastened death. Results Psychiatric morbidity among patients requesting physician-hastened death is considerable. Conclusion As a special case of suicide, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are of particular relevance to mental health professionals.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Eutanasia y autonomía de la voluntad;Revista Cálamo;2023-09-11

2. Psychological aspects of medical assistance in dying: A personal reflection.;Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne;2018-05

3. Ethik;Palliativmedizin;2017

4. Suicidality and its Associated Factors in Cancer Patients: Results of a Multi-Center Study in Korea;The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine;2012-05

5. Anxiety, helplessness/hopelessness and ‘desire for hastened death’ in Korean cancer patients;European Journal of Cancer Care;2011-03-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3