Effects of Treatment and Alternative Care on Length of Stay on a General Hospital Psychiatric Unit — Results of an Audit

Author:

Mai François M.1,Gosselin Jean-Yves2,Varan Lily3,Bourgon Luc3,Navarro Joaquin Ruiz4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario.

2. In-Patient Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario.

3. In-Patient Psychiatry, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario.

4. Psychogeriatric Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario.

Abstract

Quality controls are becoming an important part of our health care system. A medical audit is one way of evaluating quality of care, and this paper describes the results of an audit conducted to investigate the reasons for a prolonged stay on a psychiatric inpatient unit. The results showed a decrease in the mean length of stay over a five year period, although the figure remained substantially above provincial norms. A review of the hospital charts of a random sample of one in six patients whose hospital stay exceeded 30 days was carried out. It revealed that in 50.0% of cases the reasons were “medically acceptable,” in 10.3% the reasons were “medically unacceptable” and in 39.7% the reasons were “social and administrative” and beyond the control of the treating psychiatrist. The implication of these results are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference20 articles.

1. The Canadian Health Care Facilities Guide to Accreditation Ottawa ON: Canadian Council on Hospital Accreditation, 1986: 31–33.

2. Conklin T Quality assurance in psychiatric administration. In: Talbott JA, Kaplan SR eds. Toronto ON: Grune and Stratton, 1983: 273.

3. Quality assurance monitoring in psychiatry

4. Systems for quality assurance in mental health services: A strategy for improvement

5. Toward a Fairer Prospective Payment System

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3