Consent to Treat: Clinical and Legal Implications

Abstract

Procedural requirements under the provisions of the Mental Health Act can delay the implementation of treatment for an involuntary psychiatric patient refusing treatment. The authors present such a case where treatment could not be given for nearly two months during which the patient's condition sharply deteriorated. With treatment, the patient improved within two weeks and was allowed to go home. Considerable time and money was spent in the Regional Review Board hearings. The implications of the case are discussed and it is recommended that steps be taken to prevent the interference of a bureaucratic legal system in the day to day practice of psychiatry.