Therapy for Vaginismus: In Vivo versus In Vitro Desensitization

Author:

Schnyder Ulrich1,Schnyder-Lüthi Christine2,Ballinari Pietro3,Blaser Andreas4

Affiliation:

1. Formerly, Head of Psychiatric Emergency Service, Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University of Bern, Bern; Now, Head of Psychiatric Emergency Service, Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

2. Resident, Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

3. Consulting Psychologist, Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

4. Chief Psychologist, Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Objective: To verify the effectiveness of desensitization exercises with dilators in the treatment of vaginismus, while comparing 2 therapeutic variations with differing instruction procedures (“in vivo” versus “in vitro”) during the desensitization exercises. Method: A consecutive random sample of 44 female outpatients in sexual therapy were divided into groups for either treatment on a random basis. All patients were treated until the symptoms abated on the basis of a structured therapy program. The stability of the therapeutic success was verified through follow-up interviews. Results: Forty-three (97.2%) of the patients were able to have sexual intercourse after an average of 6.3 therapeutic sessions. One-third reported an increase in their sexual desire. Thirty-four of 39 patients (87.2%) would be prepared to repeat the therapy. There were no significant differences in the success and the required number of consultations for the cure between the 2 groups investigated. Conclusions: Desensitization through exercises with dilators is an effective method for treating vaginismus. The choice of instruction procedure can be left to the patient.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference25 articles.

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3