Validation of a Population-Based Algorithm to Detect Chronic Psychotic Illness

Author:

Kurdyak Paul1,Lin Elizabeth2,Green Diane3,Vigod Simone4

Affiliation:

1. Director, Health Systems Research, Social and Epidemiological Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario; Lead, Mental Health and Addictions Research Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario; Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario

2. Research Scientist, Provincial System Support Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario; Adjunct Scientist, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario; Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario

3. Analyst, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario

4. Scientist, Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario; Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Adjunct Scientist, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario

Abstract

Objective: To validate algorithms to detect people with chronic psychotic illness in population-based health administrative databases. Method: We developed 8 algorithms to detect chronic psychotic illness using hospitalization and physician service claims data from administrative health databases in Ontario to identify cases of chronic psychotic illness between 2002 and 2007. Diagnostic data abstracted from the records of 281 randomly selected psychiatric patients from 2 hospitals in Toronto were linked to the administrative data cohort to test sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values. Results: Using only hospitalization data to capture chronic psychotic illness yielded the highest specificity (range 69.9% to 84.7%) and the highest PPV (range 55.2% to 80.8%). Using physician service claims in addition to hospitalization data to capture cases increased sensitivity (range 90.1% to 98.8%) but decreased specificity (range 31.1% to 68.0%) and PPV (range 38.4% to 71.1%). Conclusion: Using health administrative data to study population-based outcomes for people with chronic psychotic illness is feasible and valid. Researchers can select case identification methods based on whether a more sensitive or more specific definition of chronic psychotic illness is desired.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3