Quality of Life Impacts of Bright Light Treatment, Fluoxetine, and the Combination in Patients with Nonseasonal Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author:

Morton Emma12ORCID,Michalak Erin E.13,Levitt Anthony45,Levitan Robert D.46,Cheung Amy45,Morehouse Rachel7,Ramasubbu Rajamannar8,Yatham Lakshmi N.13,Tam Edwin M.13,Lam Raymond W.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

2. Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria Australia

3. Mood Disorders Centre, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. Mood Disorders Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

8. Department of Psychiatry/Clinical Neurosciences, Mathison Center for Mental Health Research and Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Objective: Bright light therapy is increasingly recommended (alone or in combination with antidepressant medication) to treat symptoms of nonseasonal major depressive disorder (MDD). However, little is known about its impacts on quality of life (QoL), a holistic, patient-valued outcome. Methods: This study utilizes secondary outcome data from an 8-week randomized, controlled, double blind trial comparing light monotherapy ( n = 32), fluoxetine monotherapy ( n = 30), and the combination of these ( n = 27) to placebo ( n = 30). QoL was assessed using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). Treatment-related differences in QoL improvements were assessed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. The influence of potential predictors of QoL (demographic variables and change in depressive symptoms) were investigated via hierarchical linear regression. Results: Q-LES-Q-SF scores significantly improved across all treatment conditions; however, no significant differences were observed between treatment arms. QoL remained poor relative to community norms by the end of the trial period: Across conditions, 70.6% of participants had significantly impaired QoL at the 8-week assessment. Reduction in depressive scores was a significant predictor of improved QoL, with the final model accounting for 54% of variance in QoL change scores. Conclusion: The findings of this study emphasize that improvement in QoL and reduction in depressive symptoms in MDD, while related, cannot be taken to be synonymous. Adjunctive therapies may be required to address unmet QoL needs in patients with MDD receiving antidepressant or light therapies. Further research is required to explore additional predictors of QoL in order to better refine treatments for MDD.

Funder

Canadian Institute of Health Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3