Treating Delusional Disorder: A Comparison of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and Attention Placebo Control

Author:

O'Connor Kieron1,Stip Emmanuel2,Pélissier Marie-Claude3,Aardema Frederick4,Guay Stéphane5,Gaudette Gilles6,Van Haaster Ian6,Robillard Sophie7,Grenier Sébastien7,Careau Yves7,Doucet Pascale7,Leblanc Vicky7

Affiliation:

1. Senior Clinical Researcher, Fernand-Seguin Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec

2. Clinical Researcher, Fernand-Seguin Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec

3. Research Associate, Fernand-Seguin Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec

4. Post-Doctoral Fellow, Fernand-Seguin Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec

5. Researcher, Fernand-Seguin Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec

6. Psychologist, Louis-H Lafontaine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec

7. Psychologist, Fernand-Seguin Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) has proved effective in treating delusions, both in schizophrenia and delusional disorder (DD). Clinical trials of DD have mostly compared CBT with either treatment as usual, no treatment, or a wait-list control. This current study aimed to assess patients with DD who received CBT, compared with an attention placebo control (APC) group. Method: Twenty-four individuals with DD were randomly allocated into either CBT or APC groups for a 24-week treatment period. Patients were diagnosed on the basis of structured clinical interviews for mental disorders and the Maudsley Assessment of Delusion Schedule (MADS). Results: Completers in both groups ( n = 11 for CBT; n = 6 for APC) showed clinical improvement on the MADS dimensions of Strength of Conviction, Insight, Preoccupation, Systematization, Affect Relating to Belief, Belief Maintenance Factors, and Idiosyncrasy of Belief. Conclusion: When compared with APC, CBT produced more impact on the MADS dimensions for Affect Relating to Belief, Strength of Conviction, and Positive Actions on Beliefs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3