The DSM-III in Canada: A Survey

Author:

Junek R.W.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba and Manitoba representative to Scientific Council CPA, Atlantic Child Guidance Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Abstract

A survey of the membership of the Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) was completed for the Scientific Council to discover, first, the reaction of the members to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Third Edition (DSM-III) and second, the support given to the CPA Policy of not endorsing a particular classification system. A total of 26.3% responded. It was noted that 66.6% had studied the DSM-III in detail. Whereas the ICD-9 and DSM-II were the most used systems in the past (28.5% and 25.9% respectively), first choice systems for the future were DSM-III, 42.0% and ICD-9, 16.3%. Furthermore, the DSM-III was recommended to be used as the sole system to various associations, (Statistics Canada, Royal College, Medical Council of Canada and Postgraduate Programs) 45.9% to 51.4%, depending on which association (vs. 8.7% to 13.4% for the ICD-9). Of those responding to the question, 70.8% had a favourable impression of the DSM-III and a similar percentage wanted an ICD-10 which would incorporate features of the DSM-III. A survey of directors of postgraduate psychiatric training programs gave similar results. A total of 54.8% of the members supported changing the CPA “non-endorsement” policy. As well, 39.7% voted to maintain the policy and 5.5% did not respond. The survey provides information for the CPA in its consideration of policy about the use of classification systems. Should the policy be changed, and one system endorsed, the DSM-III receives the most support.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Psychologist attitudes toward DSM-5 and its alternatives.;Professional Psychology: Research and Practice;2022-12

2. DSM-5: Do Counselors Really Want an Alternative?;Journal of Humanistic Psychology;2017-03-08

3. DSM-5: Do Psychologists Really Want an Alternative?;Journal of Humanistic Psychology;2016-07-27

4. Classification for clinical practice: How to make ICD and DSM better able to serve clinicians;International Review of Psychiatry;2007-01

5. Clinical Utility as a Criterion for Revising Psychiatric Diagnoses;American Journal of Psychiatry;2004-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3