Prevalence of Bipolar I and II Disorder in Canada

Author:

McDonald Keltie C1,Bulloch Andrew G M2,Duffy Anne3,Bresee Lauren4,Williams Jeanne V A5,Lavorato Dina H5,Patten Scott B2

Affiliation:

1. MSc Student, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta

2. Professor, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Calgary, Alberta; Member, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta

3. Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Calgary, Alberta; Member, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta

4. Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Drug Stewardship Pharmacist, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta

5. Research Associate, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta

Abstract

Objective: Current epidemiologic knowledge about bipolar disorder (BD) in Canada is inadequate. To date, only 3 prevalence studies have been conducted: only 1 was based on a national sample, and none distinguished between BD I and II. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of BD I and II in Canada in 2012. Method: Data were obtained from the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey: Mental Health and Well-being, a cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of household residents ages 15 years and older ( n = 25 113). The survey response rate was 68.9%. Interviews were based on the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Prevalence was estimated using generalized linear modelling. Prevalence of self-reported diagnosis of BD and use of lithium were also estimated. Results: The estimated lifetime prevalence of BD I and II (based on the CIDI) in Canada in 2012 was 0.87% (95% CI 0.67% to 1.07%) and 0.57% (95% CI 0.44% to 0.71%), respectively. Prevalence did not differ by sex. The estimated prevalence of self-reported BD was 0.87% (95% CI 0.65% to 1.07%). There was a lack of congruence between CIDI-defined and self-reported BD, and few people taking lithium were positive for BD on the CIDI, which raises some concerns about the validity of the CIDI's assessment of BD. Conclusions: These prevalence estimates align with those reported in prior literature. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting general population studies that use CIDI-defined BD owing to the possibility of misclassification.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3