Classification Des Medicaments Psychotropes, Nosologie Et Echelles D'Appreciation

Author:

Villeneuve A.12

Affiliation:

1. Division de Recherches, Hôpital St-Michel-Archange, Québec, Canada

2. Département de Psychiatrie et chargé d'enseignement au Département de Pharmacologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

Abstract

Various classifications of psychotropic drugs are currently in use. Generally psychotropic drugs are first classified according to their clinical action, and then divided into subgroups according to their distinctive chemical structure. Likewise, depending upon the country, there are different classifications of men-tall illnesses which do not always correspond to one another. However, for several years, efforts have been made to standardize these classifications in order to facilitate comparisons of diagnoses on an international level. Moreover, trans-cultural studies have been undertaken in recent years in the field of nosology by means of rating scales. Rating scales are also used in psycho-pharmacology to assess the change in the mental state during clinical trials. Some of them can be applied to most psychotic states, while others are limited in scope to one nosological entity or to one symptom. Stereotyped profiles, an empiric typology and profiles of drug-responders have been derived from some rating scales. However, the data obtained from these scales and submitted to elaborate statistical analyses are directly dependent upon the accuracy of the clinical assessment. It is clear that no deduction, statistical or other, based upon these scales will yield valid results if the clinical assessment is deficient. In summary if the clinical observations are adequate the rating scales can provide precious information concerning nosology, diagnosis or symptomatology. They constitute a useful tool in the objective evaluation of more specific effects of drugs and help in their classification.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Advances in the Methodology of Cross-Cultural Psychiatric Assessment;Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review;1977-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3