Utilisation des systèmes experts en psychiatrie

Author:

Ohayon Maurice M.1

Affiliation:

1. l'Institut Philippe Pinel de Montréal, Montréal (Québec).

Abstract

Are expert systems liable to be used as consultants in psychiatry? Most expert systems deal with an over-restricted part of psychiatry and cannot be a real help in everyday care. Moreover, most of them are not actually validated (the comparison between the system's and the expert's conclusions in a few cases is not enough). Another problem is that they reflect the uncertainties of nosographie problems. Validation of such systems needs the careful checking of the logical structure of the underlying nosography, the fitness of the structure's knowledge base and the fitness of the inference engine. Moreover, the naïve use of the system by untrained clinicians is the best means of validation since it provides real life proof of the ability of expert systems to make diagnoses in unselected cases where the need for a common diagnostic reference is clear (for example, epidemiologic, psychopharmacological ornosographic research). Some of the best known expert systems in the field of psychiatry are reviewed and another expert system, Adinfer, is presented. Developed since 1982, Adinfer is a forward-tracking level O system (in its simplified version for micro-computers). The knowledge base is a translation of the DSM-III-R into production rules. The program has been included in several softwares packages and used in many clinical studies, both among psychiatrists and physicians. The program has been validated with 1,141 unselected cases, and with 47 physicians: an 83% agreement rate was found between the system's and the physician's diagnoses, taking into account that the clinicians were asked to give their conclusions according to their usual nosography. Many of the 16% discrepancies were accounted for by the differences in the nosographie classes, since they were found mainly in the “atypical psychotic” and “organic” disorders. A major benefit of expert systems is that they provide a common “expert” in multicentric studies and prevent loose checking of clinical criteria.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Decision Support in Evaluating the Impacts of Mental Disorders on Work Ability;2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences;2014-01

2. A Clinical Decision Support System for Adult ADHD Diagnostics Process;2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences;2013-01

3. How do experts recognize schizophrenia: the role of the disorganization symptom;Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria;2006-03

4. Towards a More Rational Use of Psychoactive Substances in Clinical Practice;Pharmacopsychiatry;2001-01

5. Sistemas inteligentes no diagnóstico da esquizofrenia;Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria;2000-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3