Disparities in Donor Human Milk Supplementation Among Well Newborns

Author:

Kair Laura R.12ORCID,Nidey Nichole L.23,Marks Jessie E.2,Hanrahan Kirsten2,Femino Lorraine2,Fernandez y Garcia Erik1,Ryckman Kelli2,Wood Kelly E.2

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA

2. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

3. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Abstract

Background: Donor human milk supplementation for healthy newborns has increased. Racial-ethnic disparities in supplementation have been described in the neonatal intensive care unit but not in the well newborn setting. Research aim: The aim of this study was to identify maternal characteristics associated with donor human milk versus formula supplementation in the well newborn unit. Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes dyads of well newborns and their mothers ( N = 678) who breastfed and supplemented with formula ( n = 372) or donor human milk ( n = 306) during the birth hospitalization at a single hospital in the midwestern United States. Maternal characteristics and infant feeding type were extracted from medical records. Chi-square and logistic regression were used to examine associations between maternal characteristics and feeding type. Results: Nonwhite women were less likely to use donor human milk. Compared to non-Hispanic white women, the largest disparity was with Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95% CI [0.12, 0.65]), then non-Hispanic black (adjusted OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.13, 0.76]) and Asian women (adjusted OR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.16, 0.74]). Lower donor human milk use was associated with primary language other than English and public versus private insurance. Conclusion: The goal of improving public health through breastfeeding promotion may be inhibited without targeting donor human milk programs to these groups. Identifying the drivers of these disparities is necessary to inform person-centered interventions that address the needs of women with diverse backgrounds.

Funder

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

National Institute of Mental Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference1 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3