Donor Milk or Formula: A Qualitative Study of Postpartum Mothers of Healthy Newborns

Author:

Kair Laura R.12,Flaherman Valerie J.3

Affiliation:

1. Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA

2. Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA

3. Department of Pediatrics and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

Abstract

Background: Many breastfed infants receive supplemental feeds during the birth hospitalization, either by maternal request or due to medical indications. Donor milk from a certified milk bank has become increasingly available and is now used in some settings for term and late preterm infants. No studies have explored maternal opinions about donor milk and formula as options for supplementary feedings. Research aim: This study aimed to explore maternal perceptions about donor milk and formula supplementation and implications for continued breastfeeding. Methods: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with 30 postpartum mothers of healthy newborns who breastfed and gave supplementary feedings with pasteurized donor milk and/or formula during the birth hospitalization. They analyzed transcripts using the constant comparative method and identified four major themes. Results: Identified themes included the following: (a) Donor milk is seen as temporary whereas formula is seen as an ongoing plan, (b) formula is viewed as familiar whereas donor milk is viewed as unfamiliar, (c) donor milk is costly and challenging logistically, and (d) donor milk is “healthier.” Conclusion: For mothers who view donor milk as temporary and formula as permanent, the provision of donor milk rather than formula when supplementation is medically indicated may have the potential to promote the return to exclusive maternal breastfeeding. Barriers to the use of donor milk include cost and lack of familiarity and access.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3