Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability After Modified Broström-Gould surgery: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Prospective Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Modified Broström-Gould (MBG) surgery is frequently used for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). However, conventional postoperative management (CPOM) due to prolonged immobilization may have adverse effects on tendons, ligaments, and joints, causing stiffness. This prospective, randomized controlled trial aimed to determine outcomes among patients randomized to receive CPOM plus ultrasonography-guided triple injections of leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP) compared to patients who receive only CPOM after MBG surgery. Methods: The present study included 40 patients with symptomatic CLAI who were candidates for the MBG surgery. The patients were randomized into 2 groups of 20, the control and PRP groups. In the PRP group, patients were injected with 3 doses of LR-PRP solution using ultrasonographic guidance. In the first injection, 2 mL of LR-PRP was injected near the injury site, and in the second and third injections, 4 mL of LR-PRP was injected in the tibiotalar joint. All patients received a short leg splint for 2 weeks, followed by 4 weeks in a walking boot. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS), and the secondary outcome measures were the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and ankle total range of motion (total ROM). The assessment was performed at baseline and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Results: The mean VAS and AOFAS scores improved significantly in both groups 6 months after surgery ( P < .001). However, the PRP group did not significantly improve in VAS or AOFAS scores compared with the control group. No clinically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding the total ROM scores at month 3. Conclusion: The application of LR-PRP after MBG surgery did not show any superior clinical or functional improvement over CPOM. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective randomized trial.