Integrating Patient Involvement Interventions within Clinical Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study of Health Care Professional Reasoning

Author:

Holm Anna12ORCID,Rodkjær Lotte Ørneborg13,Bekker Hilary Louise14

Affiliation:

1. Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

2. Department of Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

3. Department of Infectious Disease, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

4. Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Abstract

Background. Patient involvement interventions are complex interventions that improve patient involvement in treatment and care in health care systems. Studies report several benefits of patient involvement interventions and that health care professionals are positive about using them. However, they have not been explored as a collected group of interventions throughout the continuum of care and treatment. In addition, the relationship between patient involvement interventions and the clinical reasoning process of health care professionals has not been thoroughly studied. Design. This mixed-methods study was conducted at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark between April and November 2022 using interview data from 12 health care professionals and survey data from 420 health care professionals. Informants were medical doctors, nurses, midwives, dietitians, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists who had direct contact with patients during their daily care and treatment. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; qualitative data were analyzed via inductive and deductive content analysis. Results. Communication and interaction were seen as overarching aspects of patient involvement, with patient involvement interventions being defined as concrete tools and methods to enhance health care professionals’ explicit clinical reasoning process. Limitations. It is unclear if results are representative of all health care professionals at the hospital or only those with a positive view of patient involvement interventions. Conclusions. Patient involvement interventions are viewed as beneficial for patients and fit with the clinical reasoning of health care professionals. Clinical reasoning may be an active ingredient in the development and implementation of patient involvement interventions. Implications. In practice, health care professionals need training in person-centered communication and the ability to articulate their clinical reasoning explicitly. In research, a more in-depth understanding of the interrelations between patient involvement interventions and clinical reasoning is needed. Highlights Communication and interaction are the fundamental goals of patient involvement in practice, regardless of which patient involvement intervention is being used. Clinical reasoning is often an unconscious process using tacit knowledge, but the use of patient involvement interventions may be a way for health care professionals (at both individual and group levels) to become more explicit about and aware of their reflections. Clinical reasoning can be viewed as a mechanism of change in the development and implementation of patient involvement interventions.

Funder

region midtjylland

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference44 articles.

1. Measures used to assess interventions for increasing patient involvement in Danish healthcare setting: a rapid review

2. de Silva D. Helping measure person-centred care. A review of evidence about commonly used approaches and tools used to help measure person-centred care. 2014. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/publications/helping-measure-person-centred-care [Accessed 24 April, 2023].

3. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients

4. The impact and utility of encounter patient decision aids: Systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis

5. Patientsʼ Perceptions of Sharing in Decisions

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Advances in Multidisciplinary Approach for Liver Cancer;Liver Cancer - Multidisciplinary Approach;2024-07-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3