Parents’ Psychological and Decision-Making Outcomes following Prenatal Diagnosis with Complex Congenital Heart Defect: An Exploratory Study

Author:

Thorpe Alistair12ORCID,Delaney Rebecca K.1ORCID,Pinto Nelangi M.34,Ozanne Elissa M.15ORCID,Pershing Mandy L.1,Hansen Lisa M.3,Lambert Linda M.3,Fagerlin Angela16

Affiliation:

1. University of Utah Intermountain Healthcare Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

2. Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK

3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

4. Division of Pediatric Cardiology at Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA

5. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

6. Salt Lake City VA Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center for Innovation

Abstract

Background. Parents with a fetus diagnosed with a complex congenital heart defect (CHD) are at high risk of negative psychological outcomes. Purpose. To explore whether parents’ psychological and decision-making outcomes differed based on their treatment decision and fetus/neonate survival status. Methods. We prospectively enrolled parents with a fetus diagnosed with a complex, life-threatening CHD from September 2018 to December 2020. We tested whether parents’ psychological and decision-making outcomes 3 months posttreatment differed by treatment choice and survival status. Results. Our sample included 23 parents (average Age[years]: 27 ± 4, range = 21–37). Most were women ( n = 18), non-Hispanic White ( n = 20), and married ( n = 21). Most parents chose surgery ( n = 16), with 11 children surviving to the time of the survey; remaining parents ( n = 7) chose comfort-directed care. Parents who chose comfort-directed care reported higher distress ([Formula: see text] = 1.51, s = 0.75 v. [Formula: see text] = 0.74, s = 0.55; Mdifference = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–1.48) and perinatal grief ([Formula: see text] = 91.86, s = 22.96 v. [Formula: see text] = 63.38, s = 20.15; Mdifference = 27.18, 95% CI, 6.20–48.16) than parents who chose surgery, regardless of survival status. Parents who chose comfort-directed care reported higher depression ([Formula: see text] = 1.64, s = 0.95 v. [Formula: see text] = 0.65, s = 0.49; Mdifference = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.10–1.88) than parents whose child survived following surgery. Parents choosing comfort-directed care reported higher regret ([Formula: see text] = 26.43, s = 8.02 v. [Formula: see text] = 5.00, s = 7.07; Mdifference = 21.43, 95% CI, 11.59–31.27) and decisional conflict ([Formula: see text] = 20.98, s = 10.00 v. [Formula: see text] = 3.44, s = 4.74; Mdifference = 17.54, 95% CI; 7.75–27.34) than parents whose child had not survived following surgery. Parents whose child survived following surgery reported lower grief (Mdifference = −19.71; 95% CI, −39.41 to −0.01) than parents whose child had not. Conclusions. The results highlight the potential for interventions and care tailored to parents’ treatment decisions and outcomes to support parental coping and well-being. Highlights Question: Do the psychological and decision-making outcomes of parents differ based on their treatment decision and survival outcome following prenatal diagnosis with complex CHD? Findings: In this exploratory study, parents who decided to pursue comfort-directed care after a prenatal diagnosis reported higher levels of psychological distress and grief as well as higher decisional conflict and regret than parents who decided to pursue surgery. Meaning: The findings from this exploratory study highlight potential differences in parents’ psychological and decision-making outcomes following a diagnosis of complex CHD for their fetus, which appear to relate to the treatment approach and the treatment outcome and may require tailoring of psychological and decision support.

Funder

American Heart Association

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3