Usability of Different Methods to Assess and Improve Adherence to Therapeutic Footwear in Persons with the Diabetic Foot in Remission. A Systematic Review

Author:

López-Moral Mateo1ORCID,Molines-Barroso Raúl J.1ORCID,Herrera-Casamayor María1,García-Madrid Marta1ORCID,García-Morales Esther1ORCID,Lázaro-Martínez José Luis1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Diabetic Foot Unit, Clínica Universitaria de Podología, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Therapeutic footwear (TF) has been demonstrated to decrease the rate of recurrence in patients in remission. TF adherence determines the real effect of such treatment and, therefore, an appropriate evaluation of TF adherence is critical to decrease recurrence. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the usability of different methods of assessing adherence to TF in patients with diabetic foot ulcers under remission. The search strategy retrieved 506 articles. Title and abstract review excluded 472, while the full-text review excluded an additional 18 articles because the included data did not meet the selection criteria. Finally, we included 16 articles in this systematic review. Six (37.5%) of the 16 studies combined objective (OM) and subjective methods (SM). Only five (31.25%) evaluated OM and six (37.5%) studies only evaluated SM. Objective methods (temperature sensor, activity monitor) and subjective methods (survey, questionnaire) have successfully been used in the literature to evaluate TF adherence. Objective methods provided accurate data, whereas subjective methods led to response bias or missing data. Methods of evaluation showed that patients use the TF more frequently outdoors and on weekdays than indoors or on the weekend. In conclusion, objective methods are the most usable way to measure adherence to TF.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3