Affiliation:
1. Teaching and Research Area Mechatronics in Mobile Propulsion, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
2. Global Powertrain R&D Center, Changan Automotive Co.Ltd, Chongqing, China
Abstract
The complexity of automobile powertrains continues to increase, leading to increased development time and effort. One method to address this challenge is to shift vehicle calibration and testing tasks to simulations with Engine-in-the-Loop (EiL) test setups. This increases the efficiency of the development process through high flexibility, low prototype costs, an early starting point, and a high degree of automation. EiL emulates the dynamic interactions between the internal combustion engine and other powertrain components by closed-loop coupling to real-time simulation models. The coupling quality strongly depends on the interface properties, the hardware layout, and the control functionality of the dynamometer test bench. This paper analyzes an existing test bench and presents the impact of altered test bench parameters on different EiL quality aspects. Thereto, the setup is analyzed and a Simulink based grey box test bench model is derived. The latter is parametrized with a full factorial approach in comparison to real test bench measurements. The test bench model is then used for simulative investigations considering different test bench parameters: Two different use cases of Model-in-the-Loop (MiL) supported EiL are investigated. First, a simulative improvement of the test bench control quality by altering the PI based dyno speed controller parameters is investigated. The virtually calibrated controller parameters are applied to the real EiL system and compared to vehicle measurements. Second, sensitivity studies are shown with respect to dynamometer inertia and system dead time in terms of control quality and energy. As a major outcome, a compromise of control accuracy and stability for different speed controller parameters, dyno inertia, and system dead time is shown. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that EiL has only a small deviation in terms of energy compared to a full vehicle, making it a valid approach when considering CO2 emissions.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Aerospace Engineering
Reference25 articles.
1. Deloitte. 2021Global automotive consumer study, https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/manufacturing/us-2021-global-automotive-consumer-study-global-focus-countries.pdf (2021, accessed 27 January 2022).
2. International Energy Agency. Global EV outlook2020, https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020 (2020, accessed 27 January 2022).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献