Author:
Bowler Shaun,Donovan Todd
Abstract
AbstractWe propose a model of public response to politicized election reform. In this model, rival partisan elites send signals on the need and consequences of a proposed reform, with partisans in public adopting those positions. We apply this to test how state use of voter identification laws corresponded with public evaluations of the conduct of a state's elections. We find that the relationship between photo identification laws and confidence in state elections was polarized and conditioned by party identification in 2014. Democrats in states with strict photo identification laws were less confident in their state's elections. Republicans in states with strict identification laws were more confident than others. Results suggest strict photo identification laws are failing to instill broad-based confidence in elections, and that the reform could correspond with diminished confidence among some.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Cited by
49 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. British perceptions of voter fraud and support for voter photo identification;Social Science Quarterly;2024-08-20
2. Partisanship, Race, and Public Opinion on Redistricting: The Case of South Carolina;Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy;2024-07-12
3. Securing Elections, Securing Confidence? Perceptions of Election Security Policies, Election Related Fraud Beliefs, and Voter Confidence in the United States;Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy;2024-06-01
4. Winners, Losers, and Voter Confidence in Response to Partisan Electoral Reform;Political Science Quarterly;2024-03-05
5. Taking the Pulse of Georgia Local Election Officials After Senate Bill 202;State and Local Government Review;2024-02-29