Abstract
AbstractThe distribution of income lies at the intersection of states and markets, both influencing and responding to government policy. Reflecting this reality, increasing research focuses on the political origins of inequality in the United States. However, the literature largely assumes—rather than tests—the political mechanisms thought to affect the income gap. This study provides a timely reassessment of one such mechanism. Leveraging variation in labor laws between states and differences in the timing of adoption of right-to-work (RTW) legislation, I examine one political mechanism blamed by many for contributing to inequality. Using a variety of panel designs, I find little evidence that RTW laws have been a major cause of growing income inequality, pointing to the importance of grounding theoretical arguments about the interrelationships between states and markets in a sound empirical reality.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference43 articles.
1. Comparative Politics and Synthetic Control;Abadie;American Journal of Political Science,2015
2. What Do Right-to-Work Laws Do? Evidence from a Synthetic Control Method Analysis
3. Earnings Inequality and Subnational Political Economy in the United States, 1970–2000;Hanley;Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,2010
4. A Court for the One Percent: How the Supreme Court Contributes to Economic Inequality;Gilman;Utah Law Review,2014
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献