Author:
Bali Valentina A.,Silver Brian D.
Abstract
AbstractThe controversial presidential election of 2000 triggered a wide variety of electoral reforms in many states. We examine the impact of a state's politics, ethnicity, and fiscal health on the passage of these reforms. Using state-level data from 2001 and 2002, we find that the partisan make-up of state government frequently influenced the fate of these reforms. States with a divided government or high party competition tended not to adopt several key electoral reforms, while partisanship and the interaction of partisanship and minority representation influenced the adoption of others. Fiscal constraints and institutional arrangements had less impact on reform adoption. Overall, our findings suggest that electoral reforms were shaped more by political factors than by fiscal concerns or any objective need for reform.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference56 articles.
1. Voting Technology and Democracy;Schwartz;New York University Law Review,2002
2. Did Illegal Overseas Absentee Ballots Decide the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election?
3. McCaughlin, Abraham . 2000. “Shifting Allegiance of Hispanic Voters,” Christian Science Monitor, 5 July, 2.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献