Voting Lines, Equal Treatment, and Early Voting Check-In Times in Florida

Author:

Cottrell David,Herron Michael C.ORCID,Smith Daniel A.

Abstract

AbstractLines at the polls raise the cost of voting and can precipitate unequal treatment of voters. Research on voting lines is nonetheless hampered by a fundamental measurement problem: little is known about the distribution of time voters spend in line prior to casting ballots. We argue that early, in-person voter check-in times allow us identify individuals who waited in line to vote. Drawing on election administrative records from two General Elections in Florida—1,031,179 check-ins from 2012 and 1,846,845 from 2016—we find that minority voters incurred disproportionately long wait times in 2012 and that in-person voters who waited excessively in 2012 had a slightly lower probability—approximately one percent—of turning out to vote in 2016, ceteris paribus. These individuals also had slightly lower turnout probabilities in the 2014 Midterm Election, ceteris paribus. Our results draw attention to the ongoing importance of the administrative features of elections that influence the cost of voting and ultimately the extent to which voters are treated equally.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference53 articles.

1. Badger, Emily . 2016. “Why Long Voting Lines Could Have Long-Term Consequences.” The New York Times, November 8. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/09/upshot/why-long-voting-lines-today-could-have-long-term-consequences.html (accessed December 9, 2017).

2. Pettigrew, Stephen . 2017a.“The Downstream Consequences of Long Waits: How Lines at the Precinct Depress Future Turnout.” Unpublished Working Paper. https://www.dropbox.com/s/7eis5yychwgqstw/pettigrew%20-%20lines%20and%20turnout.pdf?dl=0 (accessed July 20, 2020).

3. Stewart, Charles . 2013a. “2012 Survey of the Performance of American Elections.” Harvard Dataverse, Study 1902.1/21624. http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/21624 (accessed July 20, 2020).

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Using Twitter to Detect Polling Place Issue Reports on U.S. Election Days;Social Science Computer Review;2024-08-09

2. Race and democratic decline in the United States: How minority population growth affects election administration;Social Science Quarterly;2024-02-26

3. Campus Voting During the COVID-19 Pandemic;American Politics Research;2024-02-26

4. How Election Rules Affect Who Wins;Journal of Legal Analysis;2024-01-01

5. Can Election Administration Overcome the Effects of Restrictive State Voting Laws?;Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy;2023-10-16

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3