Restrictive Practices and the ‘Need’ for Positive Behaviour Support (PBS): A Critical Discourse Examination of Disability Policy Beliefs

Author:

Hayward Brent A.1ORCID,McKay-Brown Lisa1,Poed Shiralee2

Affiliation:

1. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

2. School of Education, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Background Few studies have considered policies which underpin the promotion of positive behaviour support (PBS). The present study examined policy beliefs about PBS and their relationship to restrictive practices. Methods Discourse network analysis (a combination of critical discourse analysis and social network analysis) was used. Results A total of 11 policies were examined from which 38 belief statements were coded. One cluster was identified which promoted 13 dominant beliefs. Dominant discourses related to law, safety and the environment were evident. A conceptual representation of the shared PBS beliefs demonstrated contradictions in PBS policy. Conclusions There is evidence that PBS policies have become informal rules for using restrictive practices, not reducing them. They are also acting as surrogates to debate conflicts between political, personal and bureaucratic interests. Three recommendations for improved PBS policy are provided.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Professions (miscellaneous)

Reference61 articles.

1. Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process

2. The post-institutional era: visions of history in research on intellectual disability

3. American Association on Intellectual Disabilities Developmental. Behavioral supports: Joint position statement of AAIDD and The Arc. Retrived From: www.aaidd.org/news-policy/policy/position-statements/behavioral-supports (2010.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3