Finding a Balance

Author:

Eastlick Kushner Kaysi1,Harrison Margaret J.2

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Promotion Studies, School of Public Health at the University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing atUniversity of

2. Faculty of Nursing at the University of Alberta

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated how mothers employed in support staff positions make personal and family health decisions. Design: We used a critical feminist grounded theory design. Methods: Twenty women employed at a large Canadian institution participated over two years in repeat interactive interviews. Findings: “Finding a balance” was the emergent core process of health decision making in response to the basic social problem of multiple demands and uncoordinated, sometimes conflicting ideologies. Women emphasized recursive movement within a continuous process of four action phases: cueing in, figuring out, generating solutions, and assessing results. Two distinct views of finding a balance were revealed: weighing competing interests or harmonizing multiple interests. These distinctive views contributed to variation in women’s approaches to decision making and to their personal and family health experiences. Conclusions: Women’s experiences suggest a capacity for reflective practice in health decision making that provides an excellent basis for holistic, emancipatory nursing practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nursing (miscellaneous)

Reference34 articles.

1. DeMarco, R., Ford-Gilboe, M., Friedemann, M., McCubbin, H.I. & McCubbin, M.A. (2000). Stress, coping, and family health. In V. H. Rice (Ed.), Handbook of stress, coping, and health: Implications for nursing research, theory, and practice (pp. 295-332). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

2. The Imperative to Choose: A Qualitative Study of Women's Decision-Making and Use of the Birth Control Pill

3. The importance of low control at work and home on depression and anxiety: do these effects vary by gender and social class?

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3