The Tensions Between Research and Intervention in Intergroup Conflict

Author:

Lewicki Roy J.1,Alderfer Clayton P.2

Affiliation:

1. Amos Tuck School of Business Administration, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.

2. Department of Administrative Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Abstract

One of the greatest problems facing the applied behavioral scientist is the conflict between intervening in a system in order to change it and collecting research data on the system and the impact of his intervention. The interventionist-as-researcher often experiences pressures from the system to ignore certain kinds of data, to avoid certain people, or to accept its own diagnosis of its problems and their solution. The researcher-as-interventionist must likewise deal with several problems: system members become' "subjects" rather than clients, unplanned interventions threaten the coherence of his research design, and field settings themselves often give rise to data collection and analysis difficulties. This case study reports an attempt to intervene in an intergroup relationship and explores two basic problems: the tensions between research and intervention, and the inadequacy of models of intervention into interpersonal conflict for effective management of intergroup conflict.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Psychology

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3