Promoting health equity in the health-care system: How can we identify potentially vulnerable patients?

Author:

Johnsen Anna Thit12ORCID,Flink Christine Enevoldsen3,Winther Katrina Pitt4,Markussen Anne-Lene Rye5,Lund Line1,Pedersen Isabella1,Rix Bo Andreasen6,Kehlet Kristine Halling3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark

2. Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

3. Center for Patient Experience and Evaluation, Denmark

4. Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark

5. University College Copenhagen, Department of Nursing and Nutrition, Denmark

6. Patient Support, The Danish Cancer Society, Denmark

Abstract

Background: There is documented social inequality in cancer. The health-care system may contribute to health equity by targeting interventions to potentially vulnerable patients who may be at risk of not receiving optimal treatment and care. Aim: This study aimed to develop and pilot test a tool to identify patients who may need additional support. Method: The study took place in a department of palliative medicine and in a team for head and neck cancer within an oncology department. The tool to identify potentially vulnerable patients was developed based on literature reviews and interviews with patients and health-care personnel. It was pilot tested in a six-month period, with subsequent interviews with health-care personnel. Results: In total, 212 consecutive patients referred to the departments were systematically screened with the tool by health-care personnel. Of these, 74 (35%) patients were considered potentially vulnerable. The most frequently reported sign of vulnerability was ‘few supportive relations’ (47% of the vulnerable patients). Most health-care personnel found it relevant to focus systematically on these patients. However, some were concerned that using the tool could prove to be stigmatising and were critical of attributing the vulnerability to the individual. Conclusions: Most patients were considered in need of additional support because they lacked a social network or had difficulties communicating with health-care personnel. Applying a tool to identify potentially vulnerable patients was feasible and increased attention to this group of patients. However, the screening procedure was also questioned.

Funder

Ministeriet Sundhed Forebyggelse

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3