A cross-sectional national questionnaire survey assessing the views of members of the British Menopause Society on the management of patients with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy

Abstract

Objective To explore the views of members of the British Menopause Society on the management of women with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy. Study design An electronic cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Main outcome measures Investigations, treatment options and preferences for the management of women with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy. Results A total of 91/178 (51%) clinicians investigate patients with unscheduled bleeding within three to six months of starting sequential hormone replacement therapy (seq-HRT) versus 83/178 (47%) for continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (con-HRT). A total of 52/178 (29%) versus 54/178 (30%) would investigate unscheduled bleeding continuing beyond six months while 18/178 (10%) versus 26/178 (15%) would investigate within three months. Assessment is requested as urgent by 88/176 (50%) clinicians, routine by 47/176 (27%) and a two-week-wait-suspected cancer referral by 41/176 (23%). A total of 97/178 (55%) clinicians would continue seq-HRT and refer versus 117/178 (66%) for con-HRT. A total of 46/178 (26%) clinicians would change the progestogen preparation in women with unscheduled bleeding on seq-HRT. For women on con-HRT, 12/178 (7%) clinicians would change to seq-HRT and 8/178 (5%) to the Mirena IUS. The Mirena IUS is the preferred progestogen for 81/178 (45%) of clinicians when prescribing hormone replacement therapy. Conclusions There is a varied approach in the practise amongst British Menopause Society members to managing women with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy. Further research is needed to determine the optimal assessment pathways for women with unscheduled bleeding on hormone replacement therapy.