Affiliation:
1. University of Bath, UK
2. University of Freiburg, Germany
Abstract
In the wake of several recent crises, universal basic income has emerged as a serious policy solution. Not only is basic income pitched as a tool to mitigate the effects of a diverse set of emergencies, it has been argued that successive crises have importantly contributed to the surge in media and policy interest in basic income. In this article we critically examine this proposition. We first argue against the inherent functionalism of many accounts and instead propose a political economy framework that ties basic income directly to a series of mechanisms that may explain the opening up of basic income policy windows during recent crises, including the Covid-19 pandemic. It is equally important to carefully distinguish between different types of crises and we argue that two key competing types – cyclical and permanent crises – face a distinctive set of political economy constraints. We illustrate our approach by analysing the prospects of basic income in six distinct crisis events.
Reference58 articles.
1. Sustainable welfare: How do universal basic income and universal basic services compare?
2. The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities
3. Black swans and elephants on the move: the impact of emergencies on the welfare state
4. CEPAL (2020). El desafío social en tiempos del Covid-19. Informe especial Covid-19, No. 3. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45527/5/S2000325_es.pdf
5. Chrisp J. (2020) To What Extent Is a Universal Basic Income Politically Feasible in Advanced Welfare States? PhD thesis, University of Bath.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献