Affiliation:
1. Australian National University and University of Oxford,
2. University of Otago and American University of Sharjah, UAE
Abstract
This article examines the close relationship between the Australian and New Zealand business communities to ask whether the relationship is best characterized as simply a bi-lateral trading relationship, or whether there is evidence of the formation of a transnational business community. This article also seeks to explore the nature of Australia—NewZealand integration, and specifically the degree to which the relationship is interdependent or asymmetrical. Data are drawn from quantitative sources — including a dataset developed from the IBISWorld's Largest 2000 Enterprises in Australia and New Zealand, Who's Who in Australia, and Who's Who in Business in Australia — and qualitative sources, including interviews with business and policy elites. Our findings are that the relationship between the Australian and New Zealand business communities is much deeper than a bi-lateral trading relationship, but also falls short of forming one transnational community. We also find that the relationship is substantially asymmetrical in nature, raising concerns among a number of New Zealand business executives about New Zealand sovereignty.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference33 articles.
1. The Anglo Cluster: legacy of the British empire
2. Burton, M. and J. Higley (1987) `Invitation to Elite Theory: The Basic Contentions Reconsidered', pp. 219—38 in G.W. Domhoff and T. Dye (eds) Power Elites and Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献