Affiliation:
1. School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
Abstract
This paper analyses how regulations on hair are constructed and justified in the uniform policies of Queensland high schools. Covering Government, Catholic, and Protestant schools, this paper explores how uniform policy across these sectors deploys the rhetoric of community values and appropriate representation, promoting the idea that uniformity is unity. Drawing on an analysis of 50 uniform policies from Queensland schools, I explore how hair is regulated by such policies and what justifications are provided for this regulation. In doing so, I examine the idea of an imagined, idealised student body and how these regulations impact students’ ability to negotiate with gendered, classed, and racialised constructions of community.
Reference41 articles.
1. Oppressive Curriculum: Sexist, Racist, Classist, and Homophobic Practice of Dress Codes in Schooling
2. How Australian Female Muslim Students Interpret Challenges in High School Sports
3. Complex data and simple instructions: Social regulation during the Covid-19 pandemic
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2022). Schools. www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/education/schools/latest-release
5. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2020). Guide to understanding the Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA). www.myschool.edu.au/media/1820/guide-to-understanding-icsea-values.pdf