Plausibility and probability in juridical proof

Author:

Di Bello Marcello1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Philosophy, Herbert H. Lehman College, CUNY, USA

Abstract

This note discusses three issues that Allen and Pardo believe to be especially problematic for a probabilistic interpretation of standards of proof: (1) the subjectivity of probability assignments; (2) the conjunction paradox; and (3) the non-comparative nature of probabilistic standards. I offer a reading of probabilistic standards that avoids these criticisms.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Subtleties in Bayesian decision-theoretic analysis for forensic findings: Notes on recent discussion of the role of validation study data in rational decision making;Forensic Science International: Synergy;2024

2. Plausible inference in legal contest;A Plea for Plausibility;2023-03-17

3. Evidence, probability, and relative plausibility: A response to Aitken, Taroni, and Bozza;The International Journal of Evidence & Proof;2023-02-28

4. Grounding legal proof;Philosophical Issues;2021-10

5. Rebooting the new evidence scholarship;The International Journal of Evidence & Proof;2020-08-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3