Affiliation:
1. Alberto Hurtado University, Departamento de Filosofía, UAH Alameda, RM, Chile
Abstract
In this paper I argue that, given that one epistemic goal of judicial decision-making is to reach reasonably plausible decisions, the divisions of epistemic and cognitive labour help processes of judicial decision-making to better promote that goal under certain conditions. Those conditions concern the possession of a certain intellectual character (in particular, a humble and autonomous character) by the subjects exploiting those divisions of labour and the existence of a certain diversity among those subjects. So, in order to better promote reasonably plausible decisions, we should take measures that make it likely that those divisions of labour are exploited under those conditions. Given this, some prescriptive recommendations are made.
Funder
Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Natural Tendency for Wide and Careful Listening: Exploring the Relationship Between Open-Mindedness and Psychological Science;Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science;2023-05-10
2. Deliberation;The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible;2022
3. Deliberation;The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible;2021