Affiliation:
1. Criminology Institute, Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem
Abstract
Introduction: Court testimonies of mental health expert witnesses (MHEWs) received scholarly attention regarding paradigmatic differences, and ethical issues, neglecting the testimony experience. The study examines MHEWs’ testimony experience in sexual assault proceedings in Israel. Methods:16 interviews. MHEW were recruited using chain referral sampling. Interviews were analyzed based on the constructive dialectical model. Results: Three main themes were conceptualized: MHEWs’ initial image of the court, their perception of mental health and legal languages, and their perception of court conduct as a theatrical play. The themes address the experience of tension between law and mental health along with an unprecedented experience of congruence that emerges when: 1. MHEWs based their testimonies on evidence-based tests and therapeutic interventions which value objectivity, as opposed to focusing primarily on the subjective experience, accommodating the evidence-based legal debate; 2. When MHEWs and legal practitioners formed an interpersonal connection, in accordance with key relational therapeutic elements.
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference52 articles.
1. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (B) Ethics guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. Available at https://www.aapl.org/ethics.htm (accessed 15 August 2020).
2. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology.
3. Dialectics, Power, and Knowledge Construction in Qualitative Research