Digital evidence in defence practice: Prevalence, challenges and expertise

Author:

Wilson-Kovacs Dana1ORCID,Helm Rebecca2ORCID,Growns Beth3,Redfern Lauren4

Affiliation:

1. University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

2. University of Exeter, School of Law, Exeter, UK

3. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

4. King’s College London, London, UK

Abstract

This article examines how criminal defence lawyers in the English adversarial system understand and use digital evidence (DE). Its first aim is to provide an empirical insight into their practices. Secondly, the article seeks to analyse the difficulties encountered by these professionals in accessing and working with DE—both those that they receive from the prosecution and those presented by the DE they need to defend their clients. Thirdly, the article discusses how criminal defence lawyers understand DE and its limitations and select relevant expert witnesses. Fourthly, it considers how the tensions discussed can be overcome. It is argued that while systemic issues outside the control of criminal defence lawyers are likely to impact the speed with which DE and witness expertise are secured, improving these professionals’ digital literacy remains key to best representation and successful criminal justice outcomes.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference44 articles.

1. Attorney General’s Office. Annual Review of Disclosure. May 2022. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1078195/Annual_Disclosure_Review_Publication_Copy.pdf (accessed 27 September 2022).

2. Digital investigations: relevance and confidence in disclosure

3. Bellamy C (2021) Independent review of criminal legal aid: final report. Home Office. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1041117/clar-independent-review-report-2021.pdf (accessed 15 November 2022).

4. Bowcott O (2020) Legal aid services are on brink of collapse, lawyers tell MPs. The Guardian. 29 October. Available at: www.theguardian.com/law/2020/oct/29/legal-aid-services-brink-collapse-lawyers-tell-mps-justice (accessed 5 October 2022).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3