Psychiatric Evaluation in Chinese Criminal Proceedings:A Legal Perspective

Author:

Guo Zhiyuan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. China University of Political Science and Law

Abstract

Psychiatric evaluation is widely used in criminal cases to screen people with mental disorder because insanity can either exempt the offender from criminal responsibility or mitigate his/her criminal punishment. The operation of psychiatric evaluation in China used to carry a typical characteristic of civil law tradition, but recent reforms have strengthened the procedural safeguards for psychiatric evaluation and stressed the requirement of its presentation and examination in criminal trials. This article will explore how psychiatric evaluation is conducted, and how the expert opinion is presented and examined as evidence in criminal trials in China. Part I will give a historical overview of psychiatric evaluation in China's criminal cases. Part II will introduce the current legislation on psychiatric evaluation in China. Part III will explore problems with current legislation and practice. In this part, high-profile cases will be cited to illustrate loopholes in the psychiatric evaluation law and practical problems with the operation of evaluation. Potential solutions to these loopholes or problems will also be explored. Part IV will focus on the presentation and examination of psychiatrists’ expert opinion in criminal trials. Although expert witnesses are also required to testify before the court in China, very few of them take the stand in practice. This part will discuss why reforms kept failing and what should be done to bring expert witnesses to court. Psychiatrists are important expert witnesses; the discussion of live psychiatrists will shed light on the appearance of all the expert witnesses in Chinese criminal trials.

Funder

China University of Political Science and Law

Ford Foundation

American Bar Association

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference16 articles.

1. China Daily (2009) British drug smuggler executed in China, Available at www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-12/29/content_9243734.htm.

2. Chinanews.com (2008) Shanghai High People's Court publicized the ruling of Yangjia Copking Case [上海市高院公布 “杨佳袭警案”刑事裁定书]. Available at www.chinanews.com/gn/news/2008/10-20/1418701.shtml.

3. Ewing K (2010) Research indicate that there are more than 100 million Chinese suffering from mental illness, among them over 16 million suffer from severe mental illness [研究显示中国精神病患超1亿 重症人数逾1600万], May 31, 2010, available at: https://www.chinacdc.cn/jlm/mxfcrxjbxx/201005/t20100531_39167.htm (last visit November 8, 2021).

4. Who should be entitled to initiate a mental examination process? An empirical perspective

5. Development and limits to development of mental health services in China

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3