Co-learning approaches to talking and thinking about “peecycling”: Perspectives on communication, education, and practice

Author:

Opperman Shaina1,Cavicchi Julia2ORCID,Schreiber Tatiana2,Hardin Rebecca1

Affiliation:

1. School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, USA

2. Rich Earth Institute, USA

Abstract

Narratives of linearity and control have driven conventional wastewater management and modern agriculture, resulting in widespread contamination and ecological damage. In response, a growing movement to reclaim the nutrient cycle emphasizes circularity and the entanglements between our bodies, the “shadow places” where our “waste” travels, and the ecosystems that sustain us. Parallel linear narratives of diffusionist knowledge dissemination have resulted in distrust between communities and scientists, but some researchers and practitioners are rebuilding trust through connections that emphasize accessibility, accountability, active learning and co-creation spanning rural and urban, campus, and civic contexts. From study sites in Vermont and Michigan, we explore urine recycling (or peecycling as some call it) as an example of both technological and pedagogical connections re-made, arguing that active learning methods can undergird engaged research. Urine recycling has the potential to foster curiosity about ecological interconnections and imaginative thinking about alternate infrastructural futures. Our evidence comes from interviews and focus groups, as well as participant observation at site-based interventions and in experiential learning contexts. We show that the advent of more circular economies, implemented with co-learning, advances both theory and practices of postmodern, and post–postmodern infrastructures. That is, rather than reinforcing a one-way flow of information that mirrors the linearity of conventional wastewater management, co-learning approaches—where scientists and practitioners are partners in generating knowledge and solutions—address the environmental, equity, and ethical aspects of reclaiming circular nutrient flows, transforming relationships between our bodies, waterways, and foodsheds.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Agricultural Research Service

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference68 articles.

1. The Promise of Infrastructure

2. Turning waste into value: using human urine to enrich soils for sustainable food production in Uganda

3. Contact Zones: Participation, Materiality, and the Messiness of Interaction

4. Barlow M (2017) Finally facing our water-loo: It’s time to decolonise sewerage systems. The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/finally-facing-our-water-loo-its-time-to-decolonise-sewerage-systems-78095 (accessed 20 June 2023).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3