Author:
Bocarro Jason,Richards Anthony
Abstract
This article attempts to address one of the consistent themes within experiential education, notably the concern that the field lacks a strong research base. This concern has contributed to a lack of clarity which surrounds the field. Research and programmatic evaluations of adventure based experiential programs may fail to produce results for a variety of reasons. This article explores two of these reasons. The first is the break-down of the program itself and its ever-changing methods of delivery. Second is the inappropriateness of the research methodology that often follows standard procedures, which may be inconsistent with non-standard programs.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Scholar to Practitioner;Research Anthology on Doctoral Student Professional Development;2022
2. Scholar to Practitioner;Practice-Based and Practice-Led Research for Dissertation Development;2021
3. EcoWellness: integrating the natural world into wilderness therapy settings with intentionality;Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning;2018-08-09
4. Behavior Change After Adventure Education Courses;Journal of Experiential Education;2013-10-14
5. Future Paradigm or False Idol: A Cautionary Tale of Evidence-Based Practice for Adventure Education and Therapy;Journal of Experiential Education;2010-06