Affiliation:
1. University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Abstract
Kant’s progressive philosophy of history is an integral aspect of his critical system, yet it is often ignored or even treated as an embarrassment by contemporary scholars. In this article, I defend Kant and argue for the continuing relevance of his regulative assumption of historical progress. I suggest, furthermore, that the first-person stance of practical belief exemplified in Kant’s conception of hope offers new resources for thinking about the relationship between the ideal and the real in political theory.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The political value of letting hopes die;Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy;2024-05-03
2. The miraculous end of political hope;Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy;2024-04-22
3. Experimentation and the future(s) of political hope;European Journal of Social Theory;2024-02-05
4. Democratic politics and hope: An Arendtian perspective;European Journal of Political Theory;2023-07-09
5. A Kantian Account of Political Hopes as Fundamental Hopes;Kantian Review;2023-04-11