Affiliation:
1. Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
Abstract
This essay asks why Aristotle, certainly no friend to unlimited democracy, seems so much more comfortable with unconstrained rhetoric in political deliberation than current defenders of deliberative democracy. It answers this question by reconstructing and defending a distinctly Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation, one that can be pieced together out of a series of separate arguments made in the Rhetoric, the Politics, and the Nicomachean Ethics.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History
Cited by
121 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Austen’s Persuasion;Persuasion after Rhetoric in the Eighteenth Century and Romanticism;2024-06-11
2. Persuasion;Persuasion after Rhetoric in the Eighteenth Century and Romanticism;2024-06-11
3. More than Justice;Persuasion after Rhetoric in the Eighteenth Century and Romanticism;2024-06-11
4. Hazlitt, Persuasion, and Progressivism;Persuasion after Rhetoric in the Eighteenth Century and Romanticism;2024-06-11
5. Persuasion against Rhetoric;Persuasion after Rhetoric in the Eighteenth Century and Romanticism;2024-06-11