Affiliation:
1. The Ohio State University
2. University of Minnesota
Abstract
Modern sovereignty is anthropocentric, constituted and organized by reference to human beings alone. Although a metaphysical assumption, anthropocentrism is of immense practical import, enabling modern states to command loyalty and resources from their subjects in pursuit of political projects. It has limits, however, which are brought clearly into view by the authoritative taboo on taking UFOs seriously. UFOs have never been systematically investigated by science or the state, because it is assumed to be known that none are extraterrestrial. Yet in fact this is not known, which makes the UFO taboo puzzling given the ET possibility. Drawing on the work of Giorgio Agamben, Michel Foucault, and Jacques Derrida, the puzzle is explained by the functional imperatives of anthropocentric sovereignty, which cannot decide a UFO exception to anthropocentrism while preserving the ability to make such a decision. The UFO can be “known” only by not asking what it is.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History
Reference61 articles.
1. Adam, Pre-Adamites, and Extra-Terrestrial Beings in Early Modern Europe
2. From nature to history, and back again: Blumenberg, Strauss and the Hobbesian community
3. The Analysis of the Borders of the Social World: A Challenge for Sociological Theory
4. Both the promise and the limits of modern critique are suggested by Jürgen Habermas, "A Conversation about God and World," in Religion and Rationality, ed. E. Mendietta ( Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2002), 147-67; and William Connolly, Why I Am Not a Secularist (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献