Why the Anthropocene Epoch is a more pertinent concept than the Anthropocene event for understanding ongoing Earth system transition

Author:

Chakraborty Abhik1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Wakayama University, Wakayama, Japan

Abstract

While the Anthropocene Working Group proposed in 2023 to formally recognize the Anthropocene Epoch with a lower boundary ~1950, the International Commission on Stratigraphy subsequently decided to reject the proposal. Instead, some scientists have argued, the Anthropocene is better understood as an ‘event’ with no temporal boundary. This article argues that the Anthropocene as an event idea is deeply problematic due to four major logical issues: (i) the heterogeneous term ‘event’ fails to provide clarity; (ii) the ‘-cene’ suffix is used consistently for epoch-level units of the Quaternary, so a temporally diffuse impact should be described with an altogether different term; (iii) it is misleading to put Earth system change caused by myriad organisms in the past on par with the impact of Homo sapiens (a single species) and (iv) a temporally diffuse event fails to address the qualitatively different nature of the Earth system change during the Great Acceleration.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3