Communication of solar geoengineering science: Forms, examples, and explanation of skewing

Author:

Reynolds Jesse L12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Los Angeles School of Law, USA

2. Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Abstract

Although a judicious use of solar radiation modification (SRM, or solar geoengineering) appears able to reduce climate change, SRM would create risks of its own. How results and conclusions are conveyed is important. This article describes nine cases in which scientific articles and their official press releases communicate results inaccurately: by inappropriately comparing SRM with a reference world of non-elevated greenhouse gas concentrations; focusing on the residual climatic anomalies that SRM would not entirely eliminate; generalizing a predictably harmful assumed implementation regime to all possible SRM; or reporting conclusions that the paper does not substantiate. Notably, each of these cases unduly amplifies SRM’s apparent risks and limitations. Collectively they may skew SRM communication and cause negative impacts on scientific assessments, news reporting, and policy discussions. The article suggests explanations for why SRM scientists and their official communicators sometimes inaccurately convey their results as well as how they and others should respond.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geology,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change

Reference46 articles.

1. Battling Promethean dreams and Trojan horses: Revealing the critical discourses of geoengineering

2. Has the grand idea of geoengineering as Plan B run out of steam?

3. Geoengineering, the Anthropocene and the End of Nature

4. A review of climate geoengineering appraisals

5. Caldeira K (2008) We should plan for the worst-case climate scenario. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Available at: https://thebulletin.org/roundtable_entry/we-should-plan-for-the-worst-case-climate-scenario/ (accessed 18 October 2021).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3