Screening for hemodialysis graft stenosis and short-term thrombosis risk: A comparison of the available tools

Author:

Tessitore Nicola1,Lipari Giovanni2,Contro Alberto3,Moretti Francesca3,Mansueto Giancarlo3,Poli Albino3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hemodialysis Borgo Roma, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Department of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy

2. Vascular Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

3. Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Abstract

Introduction: Guidelines recommend hemodialysis graft screening to identify and repair significant (>50%) stenosis at high risk of thrombosis, but there is insufficient evidence to prefer one or other screening tool due to the lack of studies comparing all available options. Methods: Seeking an optimal screening approach, we compared the performance of all currently used tools (duplex ultrasound to detect significant stenosis (StD) and measure access blood flow (QaD), ultrasound dilution access blood flow (QaU), static venous intra-access pressure ratio (VAPR), dynamic arterial and venous pressures measurement, and monitoring) for diagnosing significant angiography-proven stenosis (StA) and predicting incipient thrombosis (occurring within 4 months) in 62 grafts. All thrombotic and symptomatic acute hypotension episodes were recorded during follow-up. Results: VAPR > 0.70 and QaU < 1600 mL/min were the best indicators to angiography for those aiming to identify the majority of StA (91% sensitivity) and QaU < 1000 mL/min or StD for those aiming to avoid unnecessary angiograms (95%–93% positive predictive value). At Cox’s analysis, the only significant thrombosis predictors were acute hypotension episodes (relative risk = 4.4 (95% confidence interval = 2.2–8.8), p < 0.0001) and QaU or QaD (14% (95% confidence interval = 8–21) or 16% (95% confidence interval = 6–25) increased risk per 100 mL/min drop in Qa, p < 0.003). Thrombosis risk (adjusted for acute hypotension) became significantly higher at QaU = 1000–700 mL/min (relative risk = 3.6 (95% confidence interval = 1.6–8.2), p < 0.001) and QaD = 1300–1000 mL/min (relative risk = 3.1 (95% confidence interval = 1.1–12.8), p = 0.031). The proportion of thromboses attributable to acute hypotension was 40% (95% confidence interval = 24–57). Conclusions: Our comparative study showed that an effective screening for graft stenosis and short-term thrombosis risk can rely on Qa surveillance alone, and suggested that avoiding acute hypotension and correcting stenosis at QaU < 1000 mL/min or QaD < 1300 mL/min can contain thrombosis risk.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3