Integrated short peripheral intravenous cannulas and risk of catheter failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Gidaro Antonio1ORCID,Quici Massimiliano1,Giustivi Davide2ORCID,Pinelli Fulvio3ORCID,Samartin Federica1,Casella Francesco1,Cogliati Chiara1,Rizzi Giulia1,Salvi Emanuele1,Bartoli Arianna1,Foschi Antonella3,Castelli Roberto4,Calloni Maria1,Gemma Marco5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “Luigi Sacco,” University of Milan, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy

2. Emergency Department ASST Lodi, Lodi, Italy

3. Department of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy

4. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

5. UOC Intensive Care Unit—Neuroanesthesia and Reanimation IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy

Abstract

Background: Short peripheral catheters (SPCs) are used to provide intravenous therapies in hospitalized patients. Recently, the category of SPC has become more complex, with the introduction in clinical practice of “integrated” SPCs (ISPCs), renewed regarding the material (polyurethane rather than polytetrafluoroethylene) and design (large wing; pre-assembled extension; preassembled needle-free connector (NFC)). Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized studies in hospitalized patients, analyzing the risk of overall catheter failure as well as the risk of each type of complication (occlusion, infiltration, thrombophlebitis, and dislodgement) for ISPCs compared to non-integrated SPCs. These systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022322970). Data sources: We searched PUBMED®, EMBASE®, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials register from April to November 2022. Results: Included studies: The research identified 1260 articles. After the abstract review, 13 studies were included for full manuscript review and, after that, six papers (4727 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Description of the effect: We found a significantly reduced risk of catheter failure (pooling all complications) for ISPCs compared to SPCs ( p = 0.002 RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.63–0.9). A significant reduction in the risks of occlusion ( p = 0.007 RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.56–0.92) was observed. As regards the risk of infiltration, thrombophlebitis, and dislodgement, the analysis showed a trend in favor of ISPCs, though not statistically significant (respectively p = 0.2 RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.64–1.1; p = 0.25 RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.78–1.07; p = 0.06 RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52–1.01). Conclusions: ISPCs significantly reduce the risks of catheter failure (overall complications) and occlusion. More RCTs are needed to understand if the preassembled ISPC is better than the composted closed system (non-integrated SPC + extension line + NFC).

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3