Perioperative arterial catheterization: A prospective evaluation of ultrasound, infection, and patient-focused outcomes

Author:

Eley Victoria12ORCID,Peters Nathan12ORCID,Woods Christine12,Llewellyn Stacey3,Derboghossian Teal4,Ogg Murray4,Rickard Claire M2567,Chin Adrian12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

2. Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3. Statistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

4. Department of Vascular Surgery, The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

5. Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

6. Herston Infectious Diseases Institute, Metro North Health, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

7. Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Background: There is little information regarding complications of arterial catheterization in modern clinical care. We aimed to determine the incidence of abnormal duplex vascular ultrasound and catheter related infections following perioperative arterial catheterization. Methods: Patients requiring arterial catheterization for elective surgery were included and insertion details collected prospectively. Duplex ultrasound evaluation was performed 24 h after catheter removal. Symptomatic patients were identified by self-reported questionnaire. On Day 7, patients answered questions by telephone, related to the insertion site, pain, and function. Results of catheter tip and blood culture analyses were sought. Univariate associations of patient and surgical characteristics with abnormal ultrasound were assessed with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Of 339 catheterizations, 105 (40%) had ultrasound evaluation. Catheters were indwelling for median (IQR, range) duration of 6.0 h (4.4–8.2, 1.8–28) with no catheter-related infections. There were 16 (15.2%, 95% CI 9.0%–23.6%) abnormal results, including 14 radial artery thromboses, one radial artery dissection, and one radial vein thrombosis. Those with abnormal ultrasound results were more likely to have had Arrow catheters inserted (68.8% vs 27%, p = 0.023) and more than one skin puncture (37.5% vs 26.8%, p = 0.031). Two of the 16 (12.5%) patients with abnormal ultrasound results reported new symptoms related to the hand compared with nine of the 88 (10.2%) with normal results ( p = 0.1). No patients required urgent referral for management. Conclusions: Thrombosis was the most common abnormality and was usually asymptomatic. There were no infections, few post-operative symptoms, and minimal functional impairment following arterial catheterization.

Funder

Metro North Hospital and Health Service

University of Queensland

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3